Muslims ripped off by CAIR
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 06, 2008Now this is amusing! The Council on American-Islamic Relations has defrauded their fellow Mohammedans. I wonder if that defrauded money went into the coffers of a Hamas slush fund.
JRH 9/6/08
**************************************
Report: Muslims ripped off by CAIR
Organization allegedly threatened to sue over subsequent complaints
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
Posted: September 05, 2008 5:12 pm Eastern
Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, which claims to represent the interests of American Muslims, allegedly defrauded a number of Muslims recently seeking help with citizenship delays, and then threatened to sue them if they complained to the media, according to a security watchdog group which has obtained internal CAIR documents.
The former legal director of CAIR's Maryland/Virginia chapter shook down Muslim hardship cases for thousands of dollars without providing promised services, officials with the Mapping Sharia Project charge.
CAIR, a nonprofit group, promoted the services of the employee, Morris L. "Jamil" Days, whom it publicly described as a civil-rights attorney, even after discovering Days was unlicensed and was fraudulently representing CAIR's clients.
CAIR's board allegedly covered up the scandal by paying defrauded Muslim families partial restitution payments while insisting they sign agreements releasing CAIR from
A Divided Jerusalem Will Destroy Jewish and Christian Sites
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 06, 2008John R. Houk
© September 5, 2008
My fellow Christians I have to inform you that the Temple attributed to Solomon and the second Temple built by Zerubbabel and later alleged to have been renovated by Herod the Great NEVER existed.
This is the case according Muslims. These Muslims are obviously anti-Semitic and anti-Christian racists; however these Muslims are clerics that have a legal standing that is not connected to the illegal terrorists (by European and Slanted Left standards anyway).
The Freedom of Religion typical American might think, “So what? Matters of faith are a personal subjective thought process which is irrelevant to objective facts.”
A typical American might think, “The Christian faith believes Jesus Christ died physically on a cross and three days latter arose from his grave totally alive with full attributes of Godhood. Scientifically this is impossible yet I believe.”
Or a typical American might think, “The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints (Mormon) believe the original native American Indians were the lost tribes of Israel. Scientifically this is ludicrous yet a Mormon of faith subjectively believes this.”
The American point is Freedom of Religion does not affect the day to day lives of American society in a violent way with objective disagreements over subjective faith. In other words – Big Deal, you can believe as you like.
History has not shown this American belief in religion. Christians contrary to their own Scripture were barbaric between themselves and those outside of the faith of Christianity; i.e. persuasion was a violent issue. Greater education and an infusion of secularism has pretty much transformed the Western World to have a greater respect for human life even in the midst of religious and/or non-religious differences.
This is not the case in the Middle East and among many Muslim immigrants (including next generation Muslim Western citizens). Violence is still the foundation of persuasion. Indeed a devout Muslim who actually follows the literal tenets of the Quran, Hadith and so on would not think twice of utilizing violence to justify a violent act.
If you are a Christian or
The Best Man Turned Out To Be A Woman
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 05, 2008Shucks I wish I would read this a couple of days ago. Ann Coulter utilizes her piercing anti-Leftist wit to praise Governor Palin and demean the hypocrites on the Left.
JRH 9/5/08
************************************
The Best Man Turned Out To Be A Woman
By Ann Coulter
09/03/2008
HumanEvents.com
John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin, governor of Alaska, as his running mate finally gave Republicans a reason to vote for him -- a reason, that is, other than B. Hussein Obama.
The media are hopping mad about McCain's vice presidential selection, but they're really furious over at MSNBC. After drawing "Keith (plus) Obama" hearts on their denim notebooks, Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews stayed up all night last Thursday, writing jokes about Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, the presumed vice presidential pick. Now they can't use any of them.
So the media are taking it out on our brave Sarah and her 17-year-old daughter.
They claimed Palin was chosen only because she's a woman. In fact, Palin was chosen because she's pro-life, pro-gun, pro-drilling and pro-tax cuts. She's fought both Republicans and Democrats on public corruption and does not have hair plugs like some other vice presidential candidate I could mention. In other words, she's a "Republican."
As a right-winger, Palin will appeal to the narrow 59 percent of Americans who voted for another
Deterrence against Iranian Retaliation
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 05, 2008Here is an interesting perspective on actively engaging Iran and its nuclear program.
Should America and Israel shake in fear of Iranian verbal promises of retribution if their nuclear WMD capabilities are attacked? Or should America and Israel utilize their own verbal promises to inform Iran that a reprisal strike will follow any Iranian shenanigans that might harm the Iranian economy or weaken the Mullocracy grip on its people?
JRH 9/5/08
****************************************
Deterrence against Iranian Retaliation
by Max Singer
September 3, 2008
Hudson Institute
The papers are full of scary scenarios about what Iran will do to Israel or to the U.S. if Israel attacks Iranian factories producing nuclear weapons. The CIA is reported to be worrying about Iranian attacks on US military forces, on Saudi oil facilities, and a variety of other potential targets of terrorism or missile attack. The extreme discussions of Iranian lashing out seem to assume that deterrence against Iran would be eliminated by the Israeli attack. But why should that be?
Should we assume that Iran now refrains from attacks against Israel and the U.S. only because it believes such attacks are illegal or immoral? Or is it possible that Iran decides how much it should use terror and other measures against Israel and the US at least partly by concern about what would happen to it if it dared such attacks? And wouldn't such concern continue – or even increase – after Iran suffered an attack?
There are several reasons why Iran's calculation about what it has to be deterred from doing would change if its nuclear factories were destroyed. But it is not likely that they will lose control of themselves from anger or humiliation. Their incentives are likely to be altered much more than emotion reduces their ability to calculate their interests. It is quite possible that the effectiveness of American and Israeli deterrence will be reduced by the destruction of Iranian nuclear factories, but it is unlikely that such deterrence will be eliminated – especially if
Countering an EMP Attack
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 05, 2008Act for America sent an email pertaining to Islamofascists like Iran utilizing an EMP blast against America.
Here is an Act for America introduction to an article written by Patrick Chisholm.
JRH 9/4/08
***********************************
Countering an EMP Attack
Act for America
Email Sent: 9/4/08
Iran’s drive to acquire deliverable nuclear weaponry is a threat not only to Israel, it’s a threat to us. As we reported in a story to you several weeks ago, the threat of a nuclear weapon being used by Iran to create an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack is very real and could have a devastating impact on our economy and national security. The commentary below discusses efforts to counter the threat of an EMP attack.
The next President is going to have to face the Iranian nuclear threat head-on, as it now becomes increasingly apparent that Iran will acquire nuclear weaponry within the next five years.
Were a successful EMP attack launched against the United States, it is likely that we would look back on today’s economy with longing. Disruptions to our communications and energy infrastructure caused by an EMP attack could be mammoth, with a corresponding collapse of our economy and significant compromising of our national security infrastructure.
ACT! for America does not endorse candidates, but as we Americans choose our next President it is incumbent on us to answer this question:
Between Barack Obama and John McCain, who has the best combination of experience, knowledge of foreign policy, and proven fortitude to make the
Hindus Commit Genocide on India’s Christians
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 04, 2008John R. Houk
© September 4, 2008
If you have read any of my blogs you are aware that I harp on the violence that I believe is inherent in Mohammedan holy writings.
Now I preface this post with those thoughts on Mohammedanism because I just read about an extremely disturbing incident in the nation of India. You might think this incident would involve Mohammedans and Hindus which are natural enemies mostly because the brutalizing conquering aspect of Islam reaped extreme violence on Hindu Indians in India’s medieval days.
This disturbing incident has zero to do with Mohammedans.
This disturbing incident has to do with Hindus operating a pogrom in the Orissa region of India. That pogrom on August 29, 2008 resulted in the approximated deaths of 50,000 Christians. Many of these Christians tortured and raped and brutalized. Christian converts from Hinduism were often given a choice to renounce their Christian faith or die a brutal tortuous death.
I read of young Nuns being burnt alive and stripped naked and gang raped.
As I was reading this from an American Christian news outlet my thoughts immediately went to the Mainstream Media (MSM).
Why was this reprehensible genocide NOT part of a global exposé on the treatment of Christians in a genocidal moment in India? I am aware America is going through a very polarizing Presidential election and hurricanes are swooping through the nations affecting the lives of Americans. BUT my God: 50,000 individuals who
Dem Attacks on Palin Experience Ironically Apply to BHO
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 03, 2008The fringe Leftists in the Democratic Party are being vile toward Sarah Palin. The Democratic Party leadership aren’t being vile however they being hypocritical. The main Dem talking point about Palin is she is inexperienced and zero foreign policy experience.
The irony is as a Governor, Palin has accomplished more substantive actions than Senator Barack Hussein Obama has as a State Senator in Illinois and as a Senator representing Illinois to Congress. Palin has as much foreign policy experience as BHO. Just because BHO did a whirlwind European receiving the adulation of non-Americans who dislike President Bush does not make BHO experienced in foreign policy.
Robert Novak has an excellent take on Sarah Palin that rubs the Leftists and Dem leadership the wrong way.
JRH 9/3/08
*********************************
McCain Comes Through
By Robert D. Novak
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Washington Post
Partisan Democrats and many members of the media consider John McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate a terrible mistake. But McCain need not worry about their criticism. His unexpected selection satisfied the people he needed to please. Republican conservatives assembling in St. Paul for the party's national convention were "ecstatic" over the choice.
Nor did the announcement Monday that Palin's 17-year-old unmarried daughter was pregnant -- but would raise the child and marry the father -- perceptibly diminish the enthusiasm for her in St. Paul by Republicans, who regarded the news as irrelevant to the vice presidential selection.
That is not only because Palin appears to be an outstanding candidate but also because McCain in his first test as party leader came through with a
Glick: Calling Israel's bluff
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 03, 2008My God! The Olmert led government is leading Israel’s citizens into the Palestinian/Arab and Iranian dream of wiping Israel off the map!
The Olmert led government has consistently made horrendous decisions that have emboldened Hamas and Hezbollah to act with total disregard to any consequences.
It gets worse: North American and Europeans in the name of humanitarian aid are opening the potential flood gates of illicit weaponry to enter
Even though the Israeli government knows this Olmert and lieutenants fear to act because of American and European public opinion. It’s ridiculous!
JRH 9/2/08
***********************
Calling Israel's bluff
By Caroline B. Glick
Sept. 2, 2008 / 2 Elul 5768
Jewish World Review
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Hamas and its international collaborators have a new plan. To forcibly end Israel's embargo of Gaza's seacoast, they intend to operate a "ferry" service that will sail from Cyprus to Gaza every couple of weeks. The plan was announced on Friday by American Hamas collaborator Paul Larudee. Larudee and 32 other Hamas collaborators from North America and Europe disguised themselves as "peace activists" last week as they ran the gauntlet of Israel's naval blockade in a bid to facilitate Hamas's unfettered access to the high seas.
Israel is fully cognizant of what these Hamas collaborators are up to. It knows they are trying to force the country to concede its vital interest in maintaining the blockade to prevent massive quantities of heavy weaponry from being brought into Iran's Hamas-controlled enclave. Israel understands what is at stake. But it has absolutely no idea how to contend with this new challenge. Speaking to The Jerusalem Post over the weekend, defense officials said
Sarah Palin vs. Barack Obama
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 02, 2008Gerard Baker writes about the differences between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama. At first glance I found the comparison amusing for it is almost written as if the two were squaring off as Presidential candidates rather than Barack as the Dem Presidential candidate and Palin as the GOP Vice-Presidential candidate.
Regardless that each is running for different Executive Offices, the Baker comparison is very compelling. I touched on this myself Here; however I did not even come close to the eloquent job of Gerard Baker.
You should take the time to read Sarah Palin vs. Barack Obama.
JRH 9/2/08 (Hat tip to ccpga)
****************************************
Sarah Palin vs. Barack Obama
By Gerard Baker
September 01, 2008
RealClearPolitics
Democrats, between sniggers of derision and snorts of disgust, contend that Sarah Palin, John McCain's vice-presidential pick is ridiculously unqualified to be president.
It's a reasonable objection on its face except for this small objection: it surely needs to be weighed against the Democrats' claim that their own candidate for president is self-evidently ready to assume the role of most powerful person on the planet.
At first blush, here's what we know about the relative experience of the two candidates. Both are in their mid-forties and have held statewide elective office for less than four years. Both have admitted to taking illegal drugs in their youth.
So much for the similarities. How about the differences?
Political experience
Obama: Worked his way to the top by cultivating, pandering to and stroking the most powerful interest groups in the all-pervasive Chicago political machine, ensuring his views were aligned with the power brokers there.
Palin: Worked her way to the top by challenging, attacking and actively undermining the Republican party establishment in her
To Leftists: What Goes Around Comes Around
Posted by johnhouk on Sep 02, 2008John R. Houk
© September 1, 2008
O my God, the duplicity of Leftists, Democrats and the Obama Campaign stooges is becoming old very quick.
Once Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain’s VP choice, the Dem Dummies’ first reaction was to attack Palin’s experience. As if Obama as a Presidential candidate could claim vast amounts of experience. The McCain camp immediately pointed out that Leftist hypocrisy.
Then the next day the Left Wing Mainstream Media tried to punch a hole in Sarah Palin’s integrity vainly attempting to directly link the Alaskan Governor to using State resources to fire a State Trooper. O yes the State Trooper abused the law of the land in relation to a bitter divorce from Sarah Palin’s sister and the threatening to the life of Sarah Palin’s father. Did the Left Wing MSM happen to mention that State Trooper Mike Wooten is still a State Trooper?
The abusive Slanted Left is relentless. NOW the Slanted Left tried to paint a picture that Sarah Palin’s youngest born was actually the child of her 17 year daughter Bristol Palin. The reality is the Lefties are wrong AGAIN!
Sarah Palin had to make public another portion of her family’s private life because of the lying Leftists. Bristol Palin is about five months pregnant and as of this date intends to marry the unborn child’s father. The April 18, 2008 birth of Trig Palin and Bristol Palin’s current pregnancy is a time line that cannot fit the Leftist accusations that Trig is Bristol’s baby.
This last muckraking by Leftists in favor of BHO should recall BHO’s public anger when independent Conservative campaigners went after Michelle for saying "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country." Of course Conservatives are not going to comply with that; however to avoid hypocrisy you would think the so-called candidate for “Change” would
powered by [ stevencopley.com ]